Whole Tomato Software Forums

Whole Tomato Software Forums

All Forums

Visual Assist

Technical Support

Template parameter create implemention error

You must be registered to post a reply.
Click here to register.

Screensize:

UserName:

Password:

Format:

Message:

Forum code is on.
Html is off.

[quote][i]Originally posted by myth5[/i]
[br]class define:
template<typename T, template<typename E, typename = std::allocator<E> > class CONT = std::deque> // deque has default template parameter
class Stack7 {
public:
	Stack7();
	~Stack7();

void Push(T const& element);
	void Pop();
	T Top() const;

bool IsEmpty() const {
		return elements_.empty();
	}

template<typename T1, template<typename E1, typename = std::allocator<E1> > class CONT1>
	Stack7<T, CONT>& operator=(Stack7<T1, CONT1> const& object);

private:
	CONT<T> elements_;
};

follow code is create by "Refactory(VA)->Create Implemention",
template<typename T1, template<typename E1, typename /*= std::allocator<E1> */> class CONT1>
Stack7<T, CONT>& Stack7::operator=(Stack7<T1* / , CONT1> const& object)
{

}

template<typename T, template<typename E, typename /*= std::allocator<E> */> class CONT /*= std::deque*/>
void Stack7<T, E, CONT>::Push(T const& element)
{

}

actually the right code is like this,

operator= function:
template<typename T, template<typename, typename > class CONT>
template<typename T1, template<typename E1, typename /*= std::allocator<E1> */> class CONT1>
Stack7<T, CONT>& Stack7<T, CONT>::operator=(Stack7<T1 , CONT1> const& object)
{

}

Push funtion:
template<typename T, template<typename E, typename /*= std::allocator<E> */> class CONT /*= std::deque*/>
void Stack7<T, CONT>::Push(T const& element)
{

}
maybe the description is incorrect,but the code say all.
[/quote]

Check to include your profile signature.
Check to subscribe to this topic.

T O P I C R E V I E W
myth5	Posted - Jan 06 2014 : 07:58:46 AM class define: template<typename T, template<typename E, typename = std::allocator<E> > class CONT = std::deque> // deque has default template parameter class Stack7 { public: Stack7(); ~Stack7(); void Push(T const& element); void Pop(); T Top() const; bool IsEmpty() const { return elements_.empty(); } template<typename T1, template<typename E1, typename = std::allocator<E1> > class CONT1> Stack7<T, CONT>& operator=(Stack7<T1, CONT1> const& object); private: CONT<T> elements_; }; follow code is create by "Refactory(VA)->Create Implemention", template<typename T1, template<typename E1, typename /= std::allocator<E1> /> class CONT1> Stack7<T, CONT>& Stack7::operator=(Stack7<T1* / , CONT1> const& object) { } template<typename T, template<typename E, typename /= std::allocator<E> /> class CONT /= std::deque/> void Stack7<T, E, CONT>::Push(T const& element) { } actually the right code is like this, operator= function: template<typename T, template<typename, typename > class CONT> template<typename T1, template<typename E1, typename /= std::allocator<E1> /> class CONT1> Stack7<T, CONT>& Stack7<T, CONT>::operator=(Stack7<T1 , CONT1> const& object) { } Push funtion: template<typename T, template<typename E, typename /= std::allocator<E> /> class CONT /= std::deque/> void Stack7<T, CONT>::Push(T const& element) { } maybe the description is incorrect,but the code say all.
1 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First)
feline	Posted - Jan 06 2014 : 12:45:28 PM I am seeing the same effect here. Thank you for the clear description. case=79393 For now you are going to need to fix the declarations manually, but hopefully VA is doing enough to make this feature useful, and hopefully you are not seeing this problem to often.

Snitz Forums 2000