| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| wstanley |
Posted - Oct 24 2006 : 01:38:19 AM
Take the following code snippet and copy into VC++ 8.
VA X b1539 then does the following:
everything in test::nvTest2 will be correct
all the details picked out by VA for test::volatileTest2 are wrong or incomplete, execpt for the local var i2
class test
{
void volatileTest2(const int i1) volatile;
int volatileTest1() volatile {return 1};
void nvTest2(const int i1);
void nvTest3(const int i1);
int m_i1;
};
void test::nvTest2(const int i1)
{
int i2;
i1;
m_i1;
volatileTest1();
volatileTest2(volatileTest1());
i2;
}
void test::volatileTest2(const int i1) volatile
{
int i2;
i1;
m_i1;
volatileTest1();
volatileTest2(volatileTest1());
i2;
}
|
| 3 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| wstanley |
Posted - Feb 25 2007 : 6:14:51 PM
Just grabbed the new build (1548) and the volatile keyword no longer seems to cause any problems.
Thank you |
| support |
Posted - Feb 23 2007 : 02:51:10 AM
Case 3220 is fixed in build 1547. |
| feline |
Posted - Oct 24 2006 : 12:13:23 PM
Confirmed. I had to do a bit of reading before I understood the meaning of a volatile function. Learn something new every day 
case=3220 |
