Whole Tomato Software Forums

Whole Tomato Software Forums

All Forums

Visual Assist

Technical Support

Gdiplus::Color always unknown

You must be registered to post a reply.
Click here to register.

Screensize:

UserName:

Password:

Format:

Message:

Forum code is on.
Html is off.

Check to include your profile signature.
Check to subscribe to this topic.

T O P I C R E V I E W
Mordachai	Posted - Jan 13 2010 : 10:53:11 AM VAX underlines Color in Gdiplus::Color. If I mouse over the symbol, it is unknown (no go to definition, etc.). If I use VS2008's "go to definition" it does. The software compiles & runs. Gdiplus::Color is certainly visible at that scope. This is ordinary, non-template code, such as: // new approach: suck out the HBITMAP Gdiplus::Color bacground_color(Gdiplus::Color::White); Even #including the GdiPlusColor.h, which defines it, doesn't help VAX. I'm running the latest full release: 10.5.1738.0 on VS2008 SP1. Any ideas?
5 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First)
Mordachai	Posted - Apr 12 2010 : 3:09:41 PM Looks good, on initial inspection. I'll post again if I have any new issues with it, but otherwise, it looks good!
sean	Posted - Apr 12 2010 : 12:08:12 PM Build 1819 has a change to our parser to better support these types of constructs, however it is disabled by default. To try out this new functionality, press the Rebuild button on the Advanced \| Performance page of the VA Options dialog, then exit Visual Studio. Use regedit to create a new string value named "AllowHashIncludeMembers" at "HKCU\\Software\\Whole Tomato\\Visual Assist X" and set the value to "Yes". Please let us know how this works out for you.
accord	Posted - Jan 14 2010 : 03:39:54 AM Yes, we will post a message here, when this case will be fixed and is included in the latest build. So you can subscribe to this topic to get email notification. In case you are interested, a link to the history of changes and fixes: http://www.wholetomato.com/support/history.asp
Mordachai	Posted - Jan 13 2010 : 5:05:23 PM Will someone post a "case 9117 fixed / closed / etc" here at some point? Or will it only show up in some future release notes?
accord	Posted - Jan 13 2010 : 12:50:47 PM I am seeing the same effect here. Thank you for the clear description. case=9117

Snitz Forums 2000