Whole Tomato Software Forums

Whole Tomato Software Forums

All Forums

Visual Assist

Technical Support

Parsing issue?

You must be registered to post a reply.
Click here to register.

Screensize:

UserName:

Password:

Format:

Message:

Forum code is on.
Html is off.

Check to include your profile signature.
Check to subscribe to this topic.

T O P I C R E V I E W
ajtruckle	Posted - Jul 11 2010 : 11:14:12 AM Hi I have this code: CATCH(CArchiveException, arEx) { if(arEx->m_cause != CArchiveException::endOfFile) { // problem reading in from log file into variables arEx->GetErrorMessage(szError, _MAX_PATH); AfxMessageBox(szError, MB_OK\|MB_ICONERROR); bOK = FALSE; } bContinue = FALSE; } END_CATCH The arEx->m_cause and all other bits inside show with the ~~~~ underneath. Why? I am using the latest build. Andrew
6 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First)
ajtruckle	Posted - Jul 12 2010 : 3:36:55 PM Thanks. I have put that into my version of the stdafx.h file. You might like to consider do the others too. I think: AND_CATCH http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/azc4yha6.aspx Andrew
accord	Posted - Jul 12 2010 : 3:27:26 PM Yes, sorry, I do have this macro I am seeing the same effect here and put in a bug report for this: case=47143 Now, I can offer 2 workarounds: 1. Turn off VA Options -> Advanced -> Refactoring -> Automatically highlight references to symbol under cursor 2. You don't need to turn off highlight refs. if you make this change: Open VA's stdafx.h as described here: http://docs.wholetomato.com?W302 then find CATCH macro and replace with this one: #define CATCH(q, e) }q*e;{
ajtruckle	Posted - Jul 12 2010 : 1:52:40 PM Hello This is standard C++ code: TRY { } CATCH(....) { } END_CATCH within the VC++ editor. You should already have this, no? It is nothing personally written. Andrew
accord	Posted - Jul 12 2010 : 1:09:44 PM Can you please provide the source for the MACRO "CATCH"? As Luke1410 said, it is possibly caused by this macro. Once I have the macro, I can look into the problem.
ajtruckle	Posted - Jul 12 2010 : 05:23:32 AM Hello! Yes, changing to try/catch does work but it is not really a viable option for me to go and change all of the code though my project where this is affected. I would appreciate VAX being adjusted to accomodate this fairly common coding practice. I continued to use the TRY/CATCH approach because you don't need to delete the exception. Andrew
Luke1410	Posted - Jul 12 2010 : 05:17:52 AM If I had to guess, VAX would get confused by the CATCH-macro. Did u try whether it works if u replace the CATHC-macro with a simple catch-statement like: catch(CArchiveException arEx) { } ?

Snitz Forums 2000