T O P I C R E V I E W |
illone |
Posted - Aug 16 2014 : 03:52:15 AM I have entire classes I don't need to step into. It would be a lot less clutter in the VA Filter view if I could have one entry that covers every function in a class.
----------------------------------------
Also in VA Filter, possibly have a way to tree sort ( the +/- expanders ) the entries in Filters. One expander for the namespace path, and one for a class.
So Filters:
Ill::Util::String::Append Ill::Util::String::Clear Ill::Util::Optional::IsUsed Ill::Util::Math::Point::operator + Ill::Util::Math::Vector::operator *
would be tree:
(-) Ill::Util ____(-) String _________ Append _________ Clear ____(-) Optional _________ IsUsed (-) Ill::Util::Math ____(+) Point ____(+) Vector
* (-) is an expanded tree node. * (+) is an collapsed tree node. * Every namespace path (to a class) gets a unique node; regardless of namespace inner hierarchy. This keeps the tree depth consistently at 3 (full namespace path -> class -> method)
Thx |
1 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
feline |
Posted - Aug 17 2014 : 1:11:41 PM Marking to step over all members of a class makes sense, I have put in a feature request for this:
case=84469
Grouping items into a tree is a good idea, I have put in a feature request for this as well, to see what our developers make of it:
case=84470 |
|
|