| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| peterchen |
Posted - Nov 07 2006 : 03:52:30 AM
Is it possible to get an Autotext replacement wihtout the default arguments for "Refactor Create Implementation"?
currently using "Create Implementation" on a declaration like
void Foo(int x=0)
results in
void Foo(int x /*=0*/ )
butI'd like to have
void Foo(int x)
P.S. thank you thank you thank you for VAssistXRefactorContextMenu! |
| 7 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| sean |
Posted - Jun 26 2014 : 01:53:56 AM
case=3495 is implemented in build 2042 (see Refactoring page of VA Options dialog). |
| feline |
Posted - Feb 04 2008 : 3:27:27 PM
Currently no progress on this. Yes, VA Snippet editor allows you some control, but not total control. |
| steinsomers |
Posted - Feb 04 2008 : 11:47:10 AM
Any news on case=3495?
The "control over the formatting of new functions when refactoring" we have is all in the VA Snippet Editor, right? |
| MHaggag |
Posted - Jun 07 2007 : 6:25:35 PM
Check this thread for a possible solution |
| feline |
Posted - Nov 07 2006 : 1:29:27 PM
Since we already offer a degree of control over the formatting of new functions when refactoring this is a reasonable option to add, so I have put in feature request
case=3495 |
| peterchen |
Posted - Nov 07 2006 : 11:45:36 AM
It's "company style" - we aren't strict about it, but it is basically to allow commenting out larger sequences using /* */ (defaults get documented in the comment above)
>> If you are trying to avoid seeing these then this is going to effect Change Signature as well
Which would be quite good :) |
| feline |
Posted - Nov 07 2006 : 08:11:53 AM
Not currently. Are these default values causing a problem, or is this just a question of personal style? The other refactoring operations (e.g. Change Signature) handle them quite happily.
If you are trying to avoid seeing these then this is going to effect Change Signature as well, which also adds them when you add a parameter with a default value. |
