Whole Tomato Software Forums
Whole Tomato Software Forums
Main Site | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
User name:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your password?

 All Forums
 Visual Assist
 Technical Support
 General parser question...
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

LarryLeonard
Tomato Guru

USA
1041 Posts

Posted - Jan 30 2004 :  10:19:07 AM  Show Profile
The VAX architecture page (http://www.wholetomato.com/x/products/architecture.html) says:

quote:
Fortunately, the better assistance in Visual Assist X comes without a price in performance. Our specially-designed parsers are low-priority, background threads yielding no impact on the responsiveness of your IDE. The threads awaken typically during idle time and go silent when you start typing. And since these parsers do not generate object code, they consume far fewer resource than traditional parsers.


I have a vague complaint that I'm not sure how to put into words. Maybe I'm just using an underpowered machine (P4, 1.7GHz, 512 Meg), but most of the time I feel like VAX's parsing is way, way behind me. I very often - too often - have to click the reparse button. When I paste in new code from another file, it takes it a long time (a relative term) to stop marking things with red underlines. It feels like it's not running during idle time at all, or not soon enough, or not at a high-enough priority, or something. (Told ya it was vague.)

Could you talk a little about how the "thread awakening" is suppossed to work? Could there be a user-settable "priority" slider or something, so I could tell the parser how many cycles I want it to use? Am I the only one that wouldn't mind giving up a little IDE responsiveness for quicker parsing (or at least, having the ability via the slider to specify that tradeoff for myself)?

Also, would it be possible (just in the Beta) to write "Starting parsing" and "Finished parsing" to the status bar (or something)? Just a thought... Thanks.


Edited by - LarryLeonard on Jan 30 2004 10:21:08 AM

willdean
Tomato Guru

134 Posts

Posted - Jan 30 2004 :  11:29:33 AM  Show Profile
I too support the idea that they should remove this disingenuous paragraph. They're fighting a battle between lazy-parsing latency and nasty jerky interruption, and have found a middle ground which is probably slightly irritating on both counts.

My personal opinion is that over-lazy parsing (but as you say, it often completley breaks after a paste and doesn't seem to parse at all, even with r-p) is a lot better than blocking stuff which interrupts the flow of my movements around the code. I'm currently using a very powerful machine, and still don't think that it's very smooth. Perhaps you and I would chose different points on your slider - particularly if there was a reliable reparse function.

I second the status-bar request - it would be nice to at least think something was happening while I'm staring at a screen full of uncoloured text.




Go to Top of Page

support
Whole Tomato Software

5566 Posts

Posted - Jan 30 2004 :  11:44:19 AM  Show Profile
There was a bug that prevented VA from parsing code as it was pasted.

Will be fixed in build 1215.

Whole Tomato Software, Inc.
Go to Top of Page

Uniwares
Tomato Guru

Portugal
2322 Posts

Posted - Jan 30 2004 :  3:25:10 PM  Show Profile
A related question is here: can we update the Scintilla dll or are we stuck with the provided one?
Go to Top of Page

support
Whole Tomato Software

5566 Posts

Posted - Jan 30 2004 :  8:41:53 PM  Show Profile
We use Scintilla only for the tiny editor appearing when you open our options dialog to edit Autotext and Code Templates.

As for replacing the Scintilla DLL, you can try. Your only possible improvement is in editing of templates. You should probably forgo the exercise and edit templates with Notepad.

While on the topic, we plan to replace the template editor with a grid control. Maybe this year.

Whole Tomato Software, Inc.

Edited by - support on Jan 30 2004 8:44:28 PM
Go to Top of Page

Uniwares
Tomato Guru

Portugal
2322 Posts

Posted - Jan 31 2004 :  3:15:30 PM  Show Profile
Right, was just curious...
Go to Top of Page

LarryLeonard
Tomato Guru

USA
1041 Posts

Posted - Jan 31 2004 :  8:25:24 PM  Show Profile
So, annnnnnyway, what about my original issues? ...
Go to Top of Page

support
Whole Tomato Software

5566 Posts

Posted - Feb 02 2004 :  8:55:17 PM  Show Profile
Parsing is done after every paste in build 1215.

Whole Tomato Software, Inc.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
© 2023 Whole Tomato Software, LLC Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000