class Test
{
void Foo(float test);
};
void Test::Foo(float test)
{
test = 5;
}
1. right-click on "test" in the class definition. 2. choose Rename...
Actual result: The list shows: - void Foo(float test);
Expected result: The list shows: - void Foo(float test); - void Test::Foo(float test) - test = 5;
Case 2: 1. right-click on "test" in the method definition. 2. choose Rename...
Actual result: The list shows: - void Test::Foo(float test) - test = 5;
Expected result: The list shows: - void Foo(float test); - void Test::Foo(float test) - test = 5;
I understand that it's not absolutely necessary that variable names in either the definition or the declaration do match, but if they are the same and the developer wants to rename them, he (IMO) would expect that after refactoring, the names used in the declaration and the definition are still the same.
Additionally, it would be very nice to get an option to rename the same argument in base/derived classes with the same function signature. I.e. in all three places here:
class A
{
public:
void Foo(float test) = 0;
};
class B
{
public:
void Foo(float test);
}
void B::Foo(float test)
{
}
refactoring: renaming method parameters
Posted - Mar 26 2010 : 2:39:30 PM
