| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
pwc
Tomato Guru
138 Posts |
 Posted - Dec 09 2010 : 1:23:01 PM
|
Hello,
In my solution, the following code is giving me false 'undefined symbol' underlines:
#include <map>
using std::map;
class CSimProps {
public:
bool GetIntProperty(int propType, int& prop) const
{
map<int, int>::const_iterator iter;
iter = intProps.find(propType);
bool foundProp = (iter != intProps.end());
if(foundProp)
prop = iter->second;
return foundProp;
}
private:
map<int, int> intProps;
};
If I copy/paste this code is a new, blank solution - it works. In my solution, I have to supply 'std::' in front of map<> to make it work. I tried rebuilding my symbol database with no luck. Any tips on how to debug this in the context of my solution? My solution is quite large (100+projects, MLOCs++).
My info:
VA_X.dll file version 10.6.1836.0 built 2010.11.10
DevEnv.exe version 9.0.30729.1 Professional
msenv.dll version 9.0.30729.1
Font: Courier New 13(Pixels)
Comctl32.dll version 6.10.7600.16661
Windows 7 6.1 Build 7600
8 processors (x86-64;
WOW64)
Platform: Win32
Stable Includes:
C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\\VC\\include;
C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\\VC\\atlmfc\\include;
C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft SDKs\\Windows\\v6.0A\\include;
C:\\Program Files\\Microsoft SDKs\\Windows\\v6.0A\\include;
Other Includes:
Stable Source Directories:
C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\\VC\\atlmfc\\src\\mfc;
C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\\VC\\atlmfc\\src\\mfcm;
C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\\VC\\atlmfc\\src\\atl;
C:\\Program Files (x86)\\Microsoft Visual Studio 9.0\\VC\\crt\\src;
|
|
|
feline
Whole Tomato Software
United Kingdom
19024 Posts |
Posted - Dec 09 2010 : 10:01:53 PM
|
When you are seeing the problem, if you place the caret into "map" what is shown in VA'c Context and Definition fields?
Where, if anywhere, does VA's Alt-G take you?
It sounds like VA's parser has found a second symbol called "map", hopefully Alt-G or Context and Definition fields will give us a clue about this other map, and its location. |
zen is the art of being at one with the two'ness |
 |
|
|
pwc
Tomato Guru
138 Posts |
Posted - Dec 10 2010 : 12:25:11 PM
|
| Alt-G takes me to the "using std::map;" line. Likewise, the definition field shows "using std.map" |
|
|
|
feline
Whole Tomato Software
United Kingdom
19024 Posts |
Posted - Dec 10 2010 : 6:13:37 PM
|
A little unexpected.
What, if anything, is suggested when you type the lines:
map<int, int>::
intProps.
Any listboxes at all? |
zen is the art of being at one with the two'ness |
|
|
|
pwc
Tomato Guru
138 Posts |
Posted - Dec 10 2010 : 6:20:19 PM
|
| Strangely, I get suggestions from a class called xxxx::ch_map for both tests (xxxx is another namespace). |
|
|
|
feline
Whole Tomato Software
United Kingdom
19024 Posts |
Posted - Dec 10 2010 : 6:46:26 PM
|
At least some form of progress, but why is VA confusing "map" with "ch_map"? The namespaces might be confusing VA, this does happen occasionally, but the class names are different.
Where does alt-g on "intProps" take you? I assume the correct line, but do further alt-g calls ever take you to some form of "ch_map" line?
Is "ch_map" a widely used class? I am wondering if you can scan through the references to this class, and see if any code jumps out to explain this confusion.
#define map ch_map
would be a good example of a confusing line, but I doubt we will be that "lucky". |
zen is the art of being at one with the two'ness |
|
|
|
pwc
Tomato Guru
138 Posts |
Posted - Dec 10 2010 : 7:04:02 PM
|
alt-g on 'intProps' takes to the correct definition.
I don't see any #defines or typedef of ch_map to map, but I'll keep looking. |
|
|
|
feline
Whole Tomato Software
United Kingdom
19024 Posts |
Posted - Dec 13 2010 : 1:51:17 PM
|
If you add a new, blank .cpp file to your solution, and then copy / paste in just the code from this thread, do you still see the problem?
I am wondering if the problem is related to one of the standard #include files in your solution, or something about the solution its self. |
zen is the art of being at one with the two'ness |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Using namespace issue?
