| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| dingweed |
Posted - Jun 20 2007 : 5:43:18 PM
Why do you guys have to re-invent the wheel again? Why create new "standard" for doing comments? Microsoft already has XML comment standard that all C# users are used to
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/5ast78ax(VS.71).aspx
why not use it instead? It's clean and readable. I even wrote a vs macro that parses function names and create XML comments. And there are tools out there that would parse your C++/h files and create MSDN like docs from it. Come on give us some love in this department. I'd like to be able to stick to one standard not 55. |
| 2 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| feline |
Posted - Jun 21 2007 : 08:28:16 AM
We have already had one request to completely hide the XML tags in XML format comments, to provide a "clean" view of them, to make the editing easier. I know when I first saw these comments I was not a great fan, they do take getting used to.
As rhummer says you just need to edit the autotext entry "Refactor Document Method" for your chosen language to use the format you want to use. |
| rhummer |
Posted - Jun 20 2007 : 6:23:07 PM
How is VA X 're-inventing the wheel' with comments? Is it the default way Document Method is formated?
I've said this in another thread, not everyone wants XML comments, each company may have different commenting requirements. Thats why VA X gives you the option to format Document Method and add you own auto text entries to setup commenting how you want it. Why should VA X supply XML formating by default, just because Microsoft says you should probably do it? I don't think it's a big fuss to change the autotext rules, or add new ones. You change it once and backup your autotext files, pretty simple. |
|
|
