| Author |
 Topic  |
|
|
Ruskialt
Junior Member
Denmark
22 Posts |
 Posted - Nov 05 2004 : 02:08:20 AM
|
Could VA reparse on loosing focus (ie h/cpp flip)?
When defining new variables in class header .h, then going to .cpp to use the variable, the new variable isn't listed. Same goes for renamed variables, VA doesn't take note. |
|
|
support
Whole Tomato Software
5566 Posts |
Posted - Nov 05 2004 : 10:59:57 AM
|
| case=424 |
 |
|
|
Ruskialt
Junior Member
Denmark
22 Posts |
Posted - Nov 10 2004 : 3:37:40 PM
|
| Can I find a list of cases and their prioity? |
|
|
|
Stephen
Tomato Guru
United Kingdom
781 Posts |
Posted - Nov 11 2004 : 05:11:20 AM
|
You can find a list of publicly-visible cases by searching the forums for the string "case=". My understanding is that Whole Tomato don't wish to commit publicly to any particularly priorities.
(Personally, I support them in this. I think they have a good balance between openness and not over-committing themselves. In fact, a rather generous balance). |
Stephen Turner
ClickTracks http://www.clicktracks.com/
Winner: ClickZ's Best Web Analytics Tool 2003 & 2004
|
|
|
|
feline
Whole Tomato Software
United Kingdom
18940 Posts |
Posted - Nov 11 2004 : 07:42:30 AM
|
Ruskialt, as a work around in this specific case i do the following:
bind ctrl+alt+num + to VAssistX.ReparseCurrentFile
and then manually trigger a reparse after a .h edit you really want VAX to pick up, before pressing alt_o
while this isn't ideal, it isn't to much hassle. |
zen is the art of being at one with the two'ness |
|
|
|
Ruskialt
Junior Member
Denmark
22 Posts |
Posted - Nov 11 2004 : 08:47:51 AM
|
Thanks to your idea I wrote this small macro to perform those two tasks (ofcause to be able to performs those steps on a single hot key):
Sub ReparseAndOpenAlternate()
ExecuteCommand "VAssistXReparseCurrentFile"
ExecuteCommand "VAssistXOpenCorrespondingHorCPP"
End Sub
This work fairly well, new variables are now in the completion list. But to my surprice, deleted variables still hang there - they aren't deleted. |
|
|
|
Stephen
Tomato Guru
United Kingdom
781 Posts |
Posted - Nov 11 2004 : 09:58:44 AM
|
| I agree that deleted variables hang around too long. It's particularly annoying when I create a new variable, immediately decide to change its capitalisation, and then find that both versions are remembered. |
Stephen Turner
ClickTracks http://www.clicktracks.com/
Winner: ClickZ's Best Web Analytics Tool 2003 & 2004
|
|
|
|
feline
Whole Tomato Software
United Kingdom
18940 Posts |
Posted - Nov 11 2004 : 4:25:42 PM
|
as i understand it deleted variables are "forgotten" when VAX does a full reparse of the relevant file. i thought that the reparse button did a full reparse, so in theory this shouldn't be happening...
*experiments*
i am seeing old variables hanging around in suggestion lists (with question marks) but not in completion listboxes. this makes a degree of sense, since a name you have just removed you may want to re-enter.
this is with C++, .NET 2003 and VAX 1283
are you seeing these old names hang around in completion listboxes, after a manual reparse? |
zen is the art of being at one with the two'ness |
|
|
|
Ruskialt
Junior Member
Denmark
22 Posts |
Posted - Nov 12 2004 : 02:23:42 AM
|
Yes I see old variables in completion listbox too. I would expect a "full reparse", like "clear & parse". But this is somehow not the case. It behaves like "reparse" is maybe a "parse" adding variables to a set, the initial "clear" is forgotten.
I'm on VC++6.0, VAX 1278 (see nothing ragarding this subject on release later releases..) |
|
|
| |
Topic |
|
Topic Locked
