As much as I G?enjoyG? the option of inserting the matching ), ] and G? when comes to the } I find that it often gets in may way as I have got a lot of G?oldG? code that I generally only have to enhance with a if, for or a while. And so I end up with doing this:
1) the old code
doSomething();
doSomethingMore();
2) Adding the new if
if(why?)
{
}
doSomething();
doSomethingMore();
3) Draging and Indenting the stuff back into place
if(why?)
{
doSomething();
doSomethingMore();
}
Which all in all is not that bad G?? only very interruptive to the workflow.
And as I find that I like to set my } by myself anyway as part of the flow of typing I personally would not miss the auto }.
So my simple wish and suggestion would be to have separate enable options for ), ], G? and }G?
cu and keep the good work up!
Topic Locked
Posted - May 30 2005 : 05:46:46 AM
